Information management in supply networks: a framework to support risk management decisions

Dario Messina, Ana Cristina Barros, António Lucas Soares

Resumo


This thesis aims at contributing with new research at the intersection of the research fields of information management and supply chain risk management. Information is a fundamental element for an effective risk management in supply networks. In spite of this, research on how to use internal and external information for risk management decisions in supply networks is scarce. Therefore, this thesis main goal is to characterize information models used in supply networks and the supply chain risk management process in order to propose an aggregated model of internal and external information for risk management decision support in supply networks. This work is based on the Design Science paradigm, which will be applied through several research methods: systematic literature review to analyse the current state of the art on information management in supply networks; field research to analyse the influence of different information organisation models in the process of supply chain risk management and to develop an information model based (artifact); and action research to implement the artifact for the definition of risk mitigation strategies in aeronautic supply networks.

Texto Completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Barratt, M., Oke, A. “Antecedents of supply chain visibility in retail supply chains: a resource-based theory perspective.” Journal of operations management, 25(6), (2007): 1217-1233.

Becheikh, N., Landry, R., Amara, N. “Lessons from innovation empirical studies in the manufacturing sector: A systematic review of the literature from 1993–2003.” Technovation, 26(5), (2006): 644– 664.

Chandra, C., Grabis, J., & Tumanyan, A. “Problem taxonomy: a step towards effective information sharing in supply chain management.” International Journal of Production Research, 45(11), (2007), 2507-2544.

Chengalur-Smith, I., Duchessi, P., Gil-Garcia, J. R. “Information sharing and business systems leveraging in supply chains: An empirical investigation of one web-based application.” Information & Management, 49(1), (2012): 58-67.

Chi, Y. L. “Rule-based ontological knowledge base for monitoring partners across supply networks.” Expert Systems with Applications, 37(2), (2010): 1400-1407.

Childerhouse, P., Towill, D. R. “Arcs of supply chain integration.”International journal of production research, 49(24), (2011): 7441-7468.

Choo, C.W. Information management for the intelligent organization: the art of scanning the environment. Information Today, Inc., 2002.

Datta, P.P. and Christopher, M.G. “Information sharing and coordination mechanisms for managing uncertainty in supply chains: A simulation study”, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 49 No. 3, (2011), pp. 765–803.

Detlor, B. Information management. International Journal of Information Management, 30, (2010) 103-108.

Elmsalmi, M., & Hachicha, W. (2014, May). Risk mitigation strategies according to the supply actors' objectives through MACTOR method. In Advanced Logistics and Transport (ICALT), 2014 International Conference on (pp. 362-367). IEEE.

Eriksson, P., & Kovalainen, A. Qualitative methods in business research. Sage. 2008

Fawcett, S. E., Magnan, G.M. "The rhetoric and reality of supply chain integration." International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management 32.5 (2002): 339-361.

Figueiredo, P., Silveira, G., Sbragia, R. “Risk sharing partnerships with suppliers: the case of Embraer.” Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 3(1), (2008): 27-37.

Flynn, B. B., Huo, B., Zhao, X. “The impact of supply chain integration on performance: A contingency and configuration approach.” Journal of Operations Management, 28(1), (2010): 58–71. Global supply chain institute report, 2014: http://globalsupplychaininstitute.utk.edu/publications/documents/Risk.pdf

Gummesson, E., “Qualitative Methods in Management Research”, Sage, 2000.

Harland, C., Zheng, J., Johnsen, T., Lamming, R. “A Conceptual Model for Researching the Creation and Operation of Supply Networks”. British Journal of Management, 15(1), (2004): 1–21.

Hevner, A., Chatterjee, S. Design Science Research in Information Systems Good. In Design Research in Information Systems (pp. 9–22). Springer Science+Business Media. 2010

Hevner, A., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. Design science in information systems research. MIS quarterly, 28(1), (2004): 75-105.

Holmström, Jan, Mikko Ketokivi, and Ari!Pekka Hameri. "Bridging practice and theory: a design science approach." Decision Sciences 40.1 (2009): 65-87.

Hung, Wei-Hsi, Chin-Fu Ho, Jau-Jeng Jou, Yi-Ming Tai. "Sharing information strategically in a supply chain: antecedents, content and impact." International Journal of Logistics: Research and Applications 14, no. 2 (2011): 111-133.

Maçada, A. C. G., Costa, J. C., Oliveira, M., Curado, C. “Information management and knowledge sharing in supply chains operating in Brazil.” International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 13(1), (2013): 18–35.

Nooraie, S. V., & Parast, M. M. (2015). A multi-objective approach to supply chain risk management: Integrating visibility with supply and demand risk. International Journal of Production Economics, 161, 192 - 200.

Omar, R., Ramayah, T., Lo, M.-C., Sang, T.Y. and Siron, R. “Information sharing, information quality and usage of information technology (IT) tools in Malaysian organizations”, African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4 No. 12, (2010), pp. 2486–2499.

Pereira, J.V. "The new supply chain's frontier: Information management." International Journal of Information Management 29.5 (2009): 372-379.

Ragatz, G. L., Handfield, R. B., Petersen, K. J. “Benefits associated with supplier integration into new product development under conditions of technology uncertainty.” Journal of Business Research, 55(5), (2002): 389-400.

Ro, Y. K., Liker, J.K., Fixson, S.K. "Evolving models of supplier involvement in design: the deterioration of the Japanese model in US auto." Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on 55.2 (2008): 359- 377.

Strategy&, 2015 (a): http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/perspectives/2015-aerospace-defense-trends

Strategy&, 2015 (b): http://www.strategyand.pwc.com/perspectives/2015-aviation-trends

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., Smart, P. "Towards a methodology for developing evidence in formed management knowledge by means of systematic review." British journal of management 14.3 (2003): 207-222.

Van Aken, J. E. “Management research as a design science: Articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management.” British Journal of Management, 16, (2005): 19–36.

Yu, M. C., Goh, M. "A multi-objective approach to supply chain visibility and risk." European Journal of Operational Research 233, no. 1 (2014): 125-130.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18803/capsi.v15.116-124

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.