Autopoiesis and organizations: a biological perspective

Ana Sara Costa, José Tribolet

Resumo


Organization studies have recently had plentiful new approaches and paradigms, such as the autopoiesis theory. Maturana and Varela developed the theory of autopoiesis − a biological theory of autopoietic systems − in order to explain the particular nature of living in the physical domain. Their main contribution has been to provide a concise specification of the defining characteristics of living systems, including humans. Several authors, especially the sociologist Luhmann, have tried to extend such theory to social systems, including organizations. Social systems are systems that are based on the interactions of living systems. The question therefore arises if organizations are also autopoietic systems. In this paper, this question and the relevance of the autopoiesis theory are discussed for understanding organizational changes and self-maintenance, from a biological point of view. Supported by the autopoiesis theory, organizations can be interpreted as networks of interactions, processes and rules of coordination.

Texto Completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Abou-Zeid, A.-S., “Toward an Autopoietic Approach for Information Systems Development”, in M. Rossi and K. Siau (Eds.), Information Modelling in the New Millennium, Idea Group Publishing, Hershey, 2013, pp. 34-52.

Aveiro, D.S.A., G.O.D. (Generation, Operationalization & Discontinuation) and Control (sub) organizations : a DEMO-based approach for continuous real-time management of organizational change caused by exceptions, PhD thesis, Universidade Técnica de Lisboa, 2010.

Beeson, I., “Information in Organisations: rethinking the autopoietic account”, in R. Magalhães and R. Sanchez (Eds.) Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 2009, pp. 185-200.

Biggiero, L., “Are firms autopoietic systems?”, in Van Der Zouwen, G. and Geyer, F. (Eds.), Sociocybernetics: Complexity, Autopoiesis, and Observation of Social Systems, Greenwood, Westport (Ct), 2001, pp. 125-140.

Fuchs, C. and W. Hofkirchner, “Autopoiesis and Critical Social Systems Theory”, in R. Magalhães and R. Sanchez (Eds.), Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 2009, pp. 111-129.

Goldspink, C. and R. Kay, “Autopoiesis and organizations: A biological view of organizational change and methods for its study”, in R. Magalhães and R. Sanchez (Eds.), Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 2009, pp. 89-110.

Hall, W.P., “Organizational autopoiesis and knowledge management”, Presented, ISD '03 Twelfth Int. Conf. Info. Syst. Dev., Melbourne, Aust., 25-27 Aug, 2003.

Hall, W.P. P. Dalmaris and S. Nousala, “A Biological Theory of Knowledge and Applications to Real World Organizations” in Proceedings, KMAP05, Knowledge Management in Asia Pacific Wellington, NZ 28-29 November 2005.

Kay, R., “Are organizations autopoietic: A call for new debate?”, Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 18, 6, (2001), 461-477.

Kay, R. and C. Goldspink, “Autopoiesis: Building a Bridge between Knowledge Management and Complexity”, in R. Magalhães and R. Sanchez (Eds.), Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 2009, pp. 233-242.

Luhmann, N., Essays on Self-reference, Columbia University Press, New York, 1990.

Luhmann, N., Social systems, Stanford University Press, Palo Alto, CA, 1995.

Magalhães, R. and J. Tribolet, “Engenharia Organizacional: das partes ao todo e do todo às partes na dialéctica entre pessoas e sistemas”, in S.G. Costa, L.M. Vieira and J.N. Rodrigues (Eds.). Ventos de Mudança, Editora Fundo de Cultura, Rio de Janeiro, Brasil, 2006.

Magalhães, R. P. Sousa and J. Tribolet, “The Role of Business Processes and Enterprise Architectures in the Development of Organizational”, Revista de Estudos Politécnicos, Polytechnical Studies Review, Vol. VI, 9, 2008.

Magalhães, R. and R. Sanchez, “Autopoiesis Theory and Organization: An Overview”, in R. Magalhães and R. Sanchez (Eds.), Autopoiesis in Organization Theory and Practice, Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley, 2009, pp. 3-25.

Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela, Autopoiesis and Cognition: the Realization of the Living, vol. 42, BSPS, Reidel, Dordrecht, 1980.

Maturana, H.R. and F.J. Varela, The tree of knowledge. The biological roots of human Understanding, Shambhala Publications Inc, Boston, MA, 1992.

Mingers, J., Self-producing systems. Implications and applications of autopoiesis. Plenum Press, NewYork, 1995.

Mingers, J., “The Cognitive Theories of Maturana and Varela”, Systems Practise, 4, 4, (1991), 319-338.

Morgan, G., Images of organization, Sage Publication, Thousand Oaks, CA, 1997.

Teubner, G., Law as an Autopoietic System, Blackwell, Oxford, 1993.

Teubner, G. and A. Febbrajo, State, Law, and Economy as Autopoietic Systems, Giuffrè, Milan, 1992.

Thannhuber, M. M.M. Tseng and H.-J. Bullinger, “An Autopoietic Approach for Building Knowledge Management Systems in Manufacturing Enterprises”, Annals of the CIRP, 50, 1, (2001), 313-318.

Tribolet, J. P. Sousa and A. Caetano, “The Role of Enterprise Governance and Cartography in Enterprise Engineering”, Enterprise Modelling and Information Systems Architectures, 9, 1, (2014), 38-49.

Varela F.H. Maturana and R. Uribe, “Autopoiesis: the organization of living systems, its characterisation and a model”, Biosystems, 5, 4, (1974), 187-196.

Zeleny, M., Human systems management: Integrating knowledge, management and systems, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 2005.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18803/capsi.v15.36-45

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.