Managing Expected Returns and Downside Risk with Information from Technical Analysis
Resumo
With the growing amount of data and information, one of the biggest challenges of information science is to transform information into useful knowledge. This paper presents an example of how we can use the scientific method to transform information from stock market data in useful knowledge, using the bootstrap methodology. We measure downside risk with a Value-at-Risk (VaR) model and take into account the joint performance in terms of returns and risks, with Sharpe type ratios. Empirical evidence presented here confirms results from previous studies that show consistently higher returns during an uptrend and the opposite during a downward trend. Additionally, provides very strong statistical evidence that downside risk is much lower during a primary uptrend than during a downward trend and performance is better in terms of Sharpe type ratios. Empirical results show that information from the primary trend obtained with a 200-days moving average is useful.
Texto Completo:
PDF (English)Referências
Araújo Santos, P. and Fraga Alves M.I., “Forecasting Value-at-Risk with a duration-based POT
method”. Mathematics and Computers in Simulation, 94 (2013), 295–309.
Araújo Santos, P., Fraga Alves, M.I. and Hammoudeh, S.“High Quantiles Estimation with
Quasi-PORT and DPOT: An Application to Value-at-Risk for Financial Variables”, The
North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 26 (2013), 487–496.
Alexander, S. S. “Price Movements in Speculative Markets: Trends or Random Walks”,
Industrial Management Review, 2 (1961), 7-26.
Aronson, D., Evidence-Based Technical Analysis: Applying the Scientific Method and
Statistical Inference to Trading Signals, Wiley, 2011.
Barone-Adesi, G., Giannopoulos, K. and Vosper. L., “VaR without correlations for portfolios of
derivative securities”, Journal of Futures Markets, 19 (1999), 583-602.
Basu, S., “Investment Performance of Common Stocks in Relation to Their Price Earnings
Ratios: A Test of the EÆcient Market Hypothesis”, The Journal of Finance, 32, 3 (1977),
-82.
Bystrom, H., “Managing extreme risks in tranquil and volatile markets using conditional
extreme value theory”, International Review of Financial Analysis, 13 (2004), 133-152.
Bohan, J. . Relative Strength: Further Positive Evidence. Journal of Portfolio Management,
Fall, (1981), 36-39.
Brown, S.J., Goetzmann, W.N. and Kumar, A., “The Dow Theory: William Peter Hamilton’s
Track Record Reconsidered”, The Journal of Finance,4 (1998), 1311-33.
Brosk, W., Lakonishok, J. and LeBaron, B. “Simple technical trading rules and stochastic
properties of stock returns”, Journal of Finance, 47 (1992), 1731-1764.
Cootner, P. H., “Stock Prices: Random vs. Systematic Changes”, Industrial Management
Review, 3, 2 (1962), 43.
Cowles, A., "Can stock market forecaster forecastes?", Econometrica,1 (1934), 309-24.
Efron, B., “Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife”, The Annals of Statistics, 7, 1
(1979), 1-26.
Ghorbel, A. and Trabelsi, A., “Predictive performance of conditional Extreme Value Theory in
Value-at-Risk estimation”, Int. J. Monetary Economics and Finance, 1, 2 (2008), 121-
Hamilton, W., The Stock Market Barometer: A study of its Forecast value based on Charles H.
Dow’s Theory of the Price Movement, Barron’s, New York, NY, 1922.
Hammoudeh, S., Araújo Santos, P. and Al-Hassan. A. “Downside risk management and VaRbased
optimal portfolios for precious metals, oil and stocks” The North American Journal
of Economics and Finance. 25 (2013), 318–334.
Holton, G.A., History of Value-at-Risk:1922-1998, Contingency Analysis Working Paper, July
, 2002.
Kuester, K., Mittik, S. and Paolella, M.S., “Value-at-Risk Prediction: A Comparison of
Alternative Strategies” Journal of Financial Econometrics, 4,1 (2006), 53-89.
McNeil A., and Frey R., “Estimation of tail-related risk measures for hetroscedastic financial
time series: An extreme value approach” Journal of Empirical Finance, 7 (2000), 271 –
Morgan, J., Riskmetrics, J.P. morgan technical document, 4th Edition, New York, 1996.
Rhea, R., The Dow Theory, Barron’s, New York, NY, 1932.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18803/capsi.v14.195-205
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.